Baroque Analysis: Rubens, “Two Satyrs”


Here I will be discussing Peter Paul Rubens, and his piece Two Satyrs, completed in Munich, Germany in 1619.

Rubens is known as one of the most influential painters of the Baroque era. An advocate of Humanist ideals, Rubens was also a devout Catholic; both of these traits were frequently demonstrated in the themes of many of his paintings. While Rubens was heavily influenced by Italian Renaissance artists (Getty, paragraph 1), his works also followed the set of standards decreed in the Catholic church’s Council of Trent, completed in 1563, which ruled that art should appeal more to the common citizen and should also be free from ideas and imagery that went against the core ideals of the church. Ruben’s paintings, including Two Satyrs, show his Humanist tendencies without defying the church’s rulings that confusing imagery, profanity, and explicit sexuality should be avoided. This was in contrast to much of Renaissance art, which frequently featured sexualized nudity, non-Catholic themes, and the popular Mannerism style which was disorganized and confusing by nature. One example of such a painting is Agnolo Bronzino’s An Allegory with Venus and Cupid completed in 1545 (location unknown), which is featured below. This painting possesses all of these “undesirable” characteristics, such as intense eroticism, cluttered composition, and prominent figures from Greek mythos.


Rubens’ paintings featured sensual images, but the explicit violence or nudity was done artistically or was avoided altogether. Additionally, his paintings were able to be interpreted by everyone, based on imagery alone, without the need for an educated background. This is supported in the National Gallery of Art’s article about Rubens, which states that “Baroque art often appeals directly to the emotions, exemplified by three of the life-size beasts in Rubens’ Daniel in the Lions’ Den that stare hungrily at the viewer…” (Paragraph 4). This is wonderfully demonstrated in Two Satyrs, which tells a Catholic story purely through emotional appeal. The Satyrs look alluring and decadent, but also dangerous and untrustworthy, which is a common theme in Christian stories about the dangers of excess and temptation.

This painting appeals to me for a large variety of reasons. For one, it is beautifully done, with attractive composition and colors. It is a nice and fun piece to look at at first glance, but it becomes more dark and interesting on further examination. The Satyr in the front appears jolly and flirtatious. He is holding grapes, frequently used as a sensual symbol in still life painting. The way he holds the grapes is beckoning, and he looks directly at the viewer of the painting. However, if you look to his left side, his eye is glowing yellow and cast in shadow, and his face is more of a sneer, indicating that he is more dangerous than at first glance. The rear satyr is sloppy and unattractive as he gulps down a drink, and together with the front satyr’s dangerous appeal, the painting sends the general message of decadence and excess leading down a dark road.

This piece is a beautiful example of a painting capable of sending the same message to whoever looks at it, regardless of context.


Artists: Peter paul rubens. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Tour: Sir peter paul rubens (flemish, 1577-1640). (2014). Retrieved from



  1. The art work is amazing and so detailed. I love how Ruben’s paintings show a different side to art. Most artists show nudity but the way how he paints the background and paints the characters it flows very well, especially since the portrait shows them all nude, nobody in the paintings seem to clash over one another. “The Two Satyrs” painting is a lovely piece and to me it shows the true meaning of the Baroque era. This era had a very real and dramatic emphasis on facial features (human features) and the painting is beautifully done how the two satyrs contrast one another.

  2. I love how you describe the painting of the Two Satyrs. The expressions truly do say it all. My first impression of the painting was that the one in front was full of mischief and was going to do something naughty at any minute. The one in the back said to me that he was just hanging out, and had no real interest in those around him. I would think he might have been pushing it with the Council of Trent in that these two or at least the one in the front looks like he maybe up to some kind of wickedness. I guess we as humans in general tend to push our limits in what we can get away with and still be alright. This painting appeals to me because of the emotions is portrays to me. I feel we all should have a little playfulness or mischievousness in our own lives. It makes our world far more interesting. You can be mischief and not be naughty. I found this video on YouTube to be interesting. They are trying to copy the Two Satyrs painting in the video. I feel the original is far more intense with emotion and the shading is off on the copy, but interesting non the less.

  3. To be honest I was a little put off by the piece Two Satyrs in the beginning. It did not appeal to me right away like some other art has. You were exactly right that this painting did follow the guidelines of the church. By comparing it to a renaissance painting you can see how drastically art changed between the Eras. I think the longer I got to look at the painting however the more interested I am became. I have to agree with Maryellener that the painting does give off emotions that could be construed as playful, or flirty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s